As a follow on to my first post in this series I thought it would be interesting to see just how much profit or loss I would make by Trading the first game of all the WTA singles matches throughout the tournament using just the following criteria. Favourite must be priced above 1.60 – 55 seconds before the start of the published start time. Stakes are to a £10 back bet on the favourite in this timeframe
If you missed this post or any posts in the series click the link below
Because I am using Bet Angel Automation for this study the trade will be hedged automatically when the score for game 2 is 0-0 at least 1 minute after the match has gone in-play. There are 20 ladies matches today (Sunday 28th May 2023) Five Matches started at around 10:00 am In the table below I have Nominated Player 1 as the Favourite
Day 1 WTA First Round Matches
Player 1
Serving
Player 2
Fav odds matched
Hedged odds
Profit/Loss
Diaz
No
Saunders
1.98
2.22
-£1.03
Podoroska
No
Ponchet
1.75
1.39
£2.59
Sabalenka
Kostyuk
<1.60
N/A
£0.00
Shymanovich
Udvardy
<1.60
N/A
£0.00
Frech
Zhang
<1.60
N/A
£0.00
Rakhimova
Yes
Bejlek
1.89
1.70
£1.10
Frenandez
No
Linette
1.96
2.02
-30p
Sakkari
No
Muchova
1.97
1.38
£4.27
Tauson
No
Sasnovich
1.67
1.54
83p
Mertens
No
Hruncakova
<1.60
N/A
£0.00
Giorgi
Cornet
<1.60
N/A
£0.00
Birrel
Yes
Jeanjean
1.87
1.6
£1.69
Zheng
Zidansek
<1.6
N/A
£0.00
Potapova
Townsend
<1.6
N/A
£0.00
Begu
Bondar
<1.6
N/A
£0.00
Pegula
Collins
<1.6
N/A
£0.00
Teichmann
Errani
<1.6
N/A
£0.00
Kasatkina
Niemeier
<1.6
N/A
£0.00
Samsonova
Volynets
<1.6
N/A
£0.00
Sherif
Brengal
<1.6
N/A
£0.00
Total P/L Today £9.15
Day 2 WTA First Round Matches
Player 1
Serving
Player 2
Fav odds matched
Hedged odds
Profit/Loss
Serrano
Bogdon
1.68
1.45
£1.40
Pera
Kontveit
1.83
1.68
86p
Pliskova
Stephens
1.91
2.14
-£1.07
Svitolina
Trevisan
1.76
1.64
72p
Kvitova
Cocciaretto
1.84
1.60
-£1.47
Mandlik
Waltert
1.91
2.18
-£1.24
Total P/L Today -80p
I have only listed the matches in day 2 that fit the criteria outlined in the post and as you can see I made a small loss from the 6 matches. So far with this trade I have a profit of £8.35 in this WTA French Open
Yesterday I looked at trading a tennis match on just the first game of the first set in a tennis match. Today I will look at the risk to reward of a trade where, when the conditions are right, we can lay the favourite if he/she is serving for the 9th game and the scores are 4 games each in the first set. As I explained in the first post in this series we get the biggest movement of odds when a break of serve occurs in a set or match. If we look at a more critical stage of a match such as the later stages of the first set where the scores are level after the 8th game then if the favourite is serving the 9th game and his/her opponent can break the serve then they would be serving to win the set in the next game. I will use Bet Angels Tennis Trader feature to demonstrate this a little more clearly than just quoting numbers. In the screenshot below I have manually set the score to 4-4 in the first set of the first round match of the French Open between Nadia Podoroska and Jessika Ponchet. Podoroska is the favourite to win this match and will probably start the match at odds of somewhere around 1.75. If the first set reaches 4 games all then Tennis Trader project her odds to be around 1.78 (the figure ringed in the set matrix)
If Podoroska wins this service game then her odds would move in to 1.66, a movement of 12 ticks. If however Ponchet can break the serve at this critical stage of the set then she would then be serving for the set in game 10 and Podoroskas odds would move significantly the other way to somewhere around 2.88. This is a movement of around 65 ticks. We can now determine a trading strategy based on these two outcomes of the 9th game and place a trade accordingly knowing our potential loss or profit. Because the biggest movement in these two scenarios are upwards in terms of ticks then we would be looking to LAY Podoroska just before the start of the game. As we are putting our trade into the market during in-play we have to take account of the fact that betfair imposes a 3 second delay from when we place the lay bet to when it actually enters the market. While this shouldnt be a problem with high volume markets it could be a problem with markets that have low liquidity so this is one of the factors we should address when we are framing the trade – if there is low liquidity we may not getour lay bet matched. This aside we can work out our risk to reward in the following way. If we LAY Podoroska at odds of 1.78 for a stake of £10 then our Liability would be £7.80 If Podoroska goes on to win the game then we would have to trade out of the match by backing her at odds of 1.66 for a stake of 10.72 so our loss on this trade if podoroska wins the game would be in the region of 72p If Ponchet breaks Podoroska’s serve then with the same lay bet in place we would, at the end of the game , be able to place a back bet on Podoroska at odds of 2.88 for a stake of £6.18 giving us a profit of around £3.74 so our risk to reward would be 72p loss or £3.74 profit. These figures might be a bit bewildering and you might wonder how I came by them. The answer is simple I used a lay bet calculator freely available across the internet in particular I used the free hedging calculator on https://www.goalprofits.com/hedging-calculator/
I looked at 188 matches last week and set betangel to automatically trade a match where this scenario met the conditions above ie The favourite must be serving for the 9th game The game scores must be 4-4 I also added another condition that the odds of the favourite at the start of the 9th game must be between 1.5 and 1.9 Of the 188 matches only 5 met the criteria and 2 of these trades saw the favorite’s serve broken. If you want to learn more about automating trades such as these using bet angel you can download a trial copy by clicking this link
Yesterday saw the first post of a new series of posts highlighting the risk to reward options of various tennis trades. In this post I outlined 4 possible trades that were available to us on the very first game of the fist set. To visit this post click on this link.
The image below is a screenshot of the flashscore site showing the result of the first game and how it was won.
As you can see Bronzetti won this game breaking Grabhers service after 2 break points. The image below is the set matrix shown in yesterdays post and I have ringed the end of set odds.
There is another feature of Bet Angel that can help us analyse our trades and this is an ability to log each players odds at whatever intervals you wish throughout the match. This enables you to see the way the odds moved as each point is won or lost. I have provided a screenshot of the 1st 6 1/2 minutes of the 1st game below.
The time elemnts of this spreadsheet are actual time ie 12:24:11 pm and if you follow the odds for Bronzetti which in this case are logged every 30 seconds you can see that her odds in the first game after 6 minutes play (12:30:14) they bottomed out at 1.39. In the next screen shot I have added the scores and you can see that when Bronzetti won a point her odds dropped and when Grabher served her 2 points that she won the odds rose slightly
Yesterday I outlined 4 different trades that we could have done on this first game in the match and Trade 2 had the best risk to reward option for us. The odds for Bronzetti to win the match at the time of writing yesterdays post was 1.74 however this was at 7 am – 5 hours before the start of the match. When the match finally started at 12:24 pm her odds had dropped to 1.69. Tennis Trader predicted that if Bronzetti won the game then her odds would be around 1.44 they actually reached 1.39.
In this case our best trade option won out and we profited by it Please subscribe to my blog if this has peaked an interest in trading tennis as I will be sharing lots more opportunities for making educated decisions on trading tennis matches and its more exciting than laying the draw in a football match.
Trading tennis might be quite daunting at first but when you actually look at some key points in tennis matches this can be a great introduction into the bewildering world of sports trading. There are so many opportunities to make (and lose) money in this activity, that many “match bettors” that have made the progression from having their betting accounts “gubbed” to gravitating to the only real option left open to them in their betfair account. With there being so many markets available every day and so much “advice” being forced on naive beginners, many lose money and therefore lose interest. In this series of blog posts I will aim to point out some of the more obscure trading opportunities I have discovered which are of less risk and more reward. Sports trading is a risk, and while you are never putting your full stake at risk there is always the greater probability that the trade will go against you and you will have to trade out of the market for a loss. This can be for a variety of reasons, lack of knowledge and lack of research being just 2. Many beginners to trading will perhaps watch a couple of YouTube videos where the presenter makes trading look so easy and lucrative that they just jump into a similar market that was shown and try and do exactly the same with catastrophic consequences. As a potential trader you must have, at the very least a working knowledge of how various markets behave. Tennis, to my mind, could be the sport where this can be learned quite easily and with a relatively low risk to your stake.
The Racing Post, a respected and some would say a vital part of British and Irish racing. The content of the paper and on line version of the only real guide to days racing is second to none but should we do our own research or just back the runners that are in BOLD in the race preview that can be found on many betting sites. I think that the Racing Post has a reputation to uphold so why would bookmakers willingly put the racing post preview at the head of the race page. Sceptical attitudes may say that if the bookies are willingly publishing these views by “Verdict” from the racing post then statistically they (the bookies) will win over all. Todays meetings come from Bellowstown, Kempton, Doncaster, Uttoxeter, Stratford, and Chelmsford City.
Looking for Level Stakes profit to £1.00 stake for all races Lets see how they get on.
First meeting in order of timing today is Bellewstown 13:20 Fast Tara (Abandoned) 13:55 Master Garvey (Abandoned) 14:30 Ten to Ten (Abandoned) 15:05 Escapingthejungle (Abandoned) 15:40 Tawaazon (Nap) (Abandoned) 16:15 Theonewedreamof (Abandoned) 16:50 Star Kissed (Abandoned)
Kempton Meeting starts at 13:30 13:30 Burgar LOST 14:05 Phantom Flight LOST 14:40 Brains LOST 15:15 Aztec Empire (Nap) LOST 15:50 Fix You 16:25 Cuban Breeze 17:00 Simply Sondheim
Doncaster next and the first race goes off at 13:50 13:50 Valadero LOST 14:25 Dirtyoldtown LOST 15:00 Asjad LOST 15:35 Awaal (Nap) 16:10 Poker Face 16:45 Ribal 17:20 Aldbourne 17:50 Aone Ally
Uttoxeter 14:10 Tonto Foley LOST 14:45 Sporting Ace LOST 15:20 Corey’s Courage LOST 15:55 Blackjack Magic 16:30 Gold Emery 17:05 Had to be Hugo (Nap) 17:35 Mistral Milly
The final meeting of the afternoon is from Stratford 14:17 Beau Balko LOST 14:52 The Grey Falco (Nap) LOST 15:27 Weebil LOST 16:02 Lamanver Bel Ami 16:37 Go Steady 17:12 Banteer
The sole evening meeting is from Chelmsford City and first race goes off at 17:30. 17:30 Vitralite 18:00 Boasty 18:30 Prenup (Nap) 19:00 Iconic Moment 19:30 Beyond Equal 20:00 Pending Appeal 20:30 Heath Rise
I have annotated the Nap selections for each meetings but will list them again here Bellowstown 15:40 Tawaazon (Nap) Kempton 15:15 Aztec Empire (Nap) Doncaster 15:35 Awaal (Nap) Uttoxeter 17:05 Had to be Hugo (Nap) Stratford 14:52 The Grey Falco (Nap) Chelmsford 18:30 Prenup (Nap)
Tonights premiership clash is between London Clubs Crystal Palace and Arsenal.
Crystal Palace v Arsenal
As you can see from the screenshot of my Premiership workbook above this game scores highly at 59/110 with Arsenal making up 42 of those points. Arsenals first half over 0.5 goals percentage is 92% with their average opening Goal scored before the 20 mins. They have also managed to score the opening goal in 9 of their 13 away games with all of them coming in the first half. Slightly concerning is Crystal Palace and their 67% of games where they managed to keep a clean sheet in the first half. Even with the caveat of Crystal Palaces’ clean sheet record I would still be confident that there will be at least one goal in the first half and at odds of 2.8 might be temped to back Arsenal to win the half.
If you are interested in this workbook and others I have produced for other leagues please visit this post linked below where they can all be downloaded for free Please take care to update the workbooks before each game. full instructions are on this post also. https://bet-or-not.com/2022/03/28/backing-over-0-5-goals-in-the-first-half/
Emotional gambling, hunch betting and chasing losses are just 3 reasons why punters lose and bookies win. How then can we take some of this uncertainty out of the equation and put some solid research together in an ordered and unbiased way that will enable us to make a more informed and unemotional decision of where to risk our money? Creating a flow chart that defines definite criteria for us to follow is certainly one way and with excel this task can be done with relative ease.
Flow chart for Laying the Draw
The screenshot above is an example of a flowchart I have been working on to help me identify football games where I can trade laying the draw in either the half time or full time markets using set criteria to avoid making uninformed decisions. While this is still in its development stage I hope you can see the advantages of using a tool such as this may help you in the quest for making a bit of money from the bookies instead of handing good money after bad to them.
Yesterdays Front runners with their BSP and in play low and the number of ticks dropped
Wetherby
11:50
Top and Drop
5.5
1.01
184
Leopardstown
12:05
Doctor Brown Bear
17.38
8.2
23
Chepstow
13:05
Paint The Dream
8.16
4.8
22
Wetherby
14:15
Cornerstone lad
19.35
7
33
Chepstow
14:50
Hold That Taught
11
5.1
31
Leopardstown
14:55
Coko Beach
17
6.6
31
Kempton
15:10
Morning Vicar
14
14.5
-1
Chepstow
15:25
Getaround
6.8
6.6
1
Kempton
15:40
The Widdow Maker
12.37
3.5
54
Wolverhampton
16:40
Aasser
1.71
1.01
70
Wolverhampton
17:40
Winklevi
4.7
1.01
176
Wolverhampton
18:40
Eponina
N.R.
N.R.
N/A
Yesterdays Front Runners
With the exception of Morning Vicar in the 15:10 at Kempton they all traded in-play lower than their BSP. All but 2 (Morning Vicar and Getaround) traded at least 20 ticks below BSP.
Understanding the initial direction of the Over or Under goals markets on a betting exchange when the game goes in-play and the different speeds that the market moves is key to judging your risk when trading. Grasping this and understanding what happens when a goal is scored is half the battle to making profit in these markets. As a game goes in-play the probability of a goal being scored begins to diminish when you are trading the Over goals market which means that the odds will increase as the minutes tick away. Depending on which Over market you are attempting to trade, when a goal does go in, the odds will take a very steep drop to a level where the probability of the market being fulfilled will reflect in the odds depending on what time the goal was scored. For instance If you had laid the Over 2.5 goals and the first goal went in after 5 minutes then there are 85 more minutes of the game left for the remaining 2 goals to be scored and the probability of this happening will reflect as very high and the odds will plummet to a point which would put you into a loss position in the market. If, however, the first goal wasnt scored until the 85th minute then the probability of 2 more goals being scored in the final 5 minutes is very low and the movement in the odds would be slight, if at all. To demonstrate this visually I am going to use a smart bit of software called BetAngel and a feature in the program called “Soccer Mystic”. This will “predict” the odds during a predetermined game if or when goals are scored. There is a game tonight in the English Championship between Barnsley and Swansea City and for no other reason that it is first alphabetically will serve my purpose admirably. At the time of posting this the predicted lay odds on the Over 2.5 goals market is 1.91. While this is just a predicted odds level at kick-off the market can be different depending on factors such as team sheet announcements, but for the purposes of this it will suit. If we say that we have a lay bet of £5.00 at odds of 1.91 this would give us a liability (total ammount we can lose) of £4.55 at kick-off. We can use “Soccer Mystic” to see our profit/loss should a goal be scored in the fifth minute. The screen shot below shows the predicted odds if no goal is scored in minute 5 and the predicted odds if there was a fifth minute goal
Barnsley v Swansea predicted odds after 5 minutes
As you can see we can determine our risk if there was a goal in the 5th minute and this would be a loss of £2.08 if we traded out. In the next screen shot Soccer Mystic also gives a visual representation of how the market “recovers” as the match progresses and can give us an indication as to when we could trade out for no loss if while watching the match we ascertain that the first goal was a fluke i.e. own goal or a lucky fumble in the box and decide to let the bet run to our predetermined exit point.
Click pic to enlarge in a new window
The predicted odds are shown by the red line in the graph and as you can see after the first goal going in at the 5th minute the odds plunged to 1.34 but then as the game progresses and no other goal is scored the market recovers slowly to rise after about 35 minutes in-play time to a break even point where we can exit the trade for a no loss/profit. In the graph the horizontal blue line is the “profit” line and when we are laying the market when the red line is above the blue a profitable trade is possible. As with all things betting or trading research is the key and you may have noticed that I mentioned a predetermined exit point. After doing some really basic research on this game tonight I came to a decision, provisionally, that the first goal probably, using previous games as a guide that perhaps, barring fluke goals, the first goal might be some time after the 17th minute. Using this as our control point we can set out exit point at 15 minutes win or lose
Click pic to enlarge in a new window
In the screen shot above I have pointed the cursor at 15 minutes and in the ringed box shows us that the predicted odds after 15 minutes when the first goal was scored after 5 mins would be about 1.49. This would leave us in a losing position but if we were right and the next goal went in at minute 17 then our loss would be greater. If of course no goal was scored and we trade out at 15 minutes Soccer Mystic can show us our predicted profit as shown below.
Barnsley v Swansea 15 minute goal
I am sure you are thinking “what if I want to back over 2.5 goals ” then the opposite applies and if you had backed this market at the odds shown and a quick goal was scored then the odds would move dramatically in your favour to enable you to trade out at a profit. as shown below.
Barnsley v Swansea back bet 5 minute goal
We would exit this trade at this point for a £1.93 profit and this would be great but again when we go into this trade we need to pick an exit point and having done the same research we think that the first goal will be at about 17 minutes how far past this point do we go if no goals are scored. If we pick our exit point at say 25 minutes and no goals are scored Soccer Mystic can show us what sort of loss we would expect to take as demonstrated below
Barnsley v Swansea 25 minute goal on a back bet
As you can see an overall loss of £1.95 would be our exit loss. To summarise if we are laying an “Over” market the odds rise steadily in our favour and continue to provide the potential profit but as soon as a goal is scored our profit potential vanishes to be replaced with the very great risk of a losing trade, on the flip side, if we back the “over” market then our position is of a losing trade until a goal goes in and the earlier the better.
Just for fun there are 7 championship matches tonight and the average time for a first goal this season in the championship league is 32 minutes the following 7 screen shots show what you could expect to win if you laid the Over 2.5 goals market and each game remained goalless until this point.
These 7 screenshots predict the odds and probable trade out profit if there were no goals in their respective games
I have been meaning to write this post for over a week after following Betfairs’ tipsters one evening on the football. Betfair proudly promoted their football tipsters under the banner “Thursday Football Cheat Sheet: All The Best Bets In One Place” Was this the best bets for them or the punters? What happened will shock you. On the 3rd of November Genk hosted West Ham and Betfair is quoted at saying “West Ham have won all three of their UEL games so far and are a decent bet to maintain that winning streak” Kevin Hatchard then goes on to to say that Genk has only won one of their last 4 home matches, he failed to mention the fact that they (Gent) were victorious over Rapid Vienna away who in turn went on to beat Dinamo Zagreb 2-1. I feel that these two bits of information should have been included in his write-up. He also hinted that a “Win to Nil” for a “Chunky” 3.85 was a sensible play but given the information above would make this financial suicide. Hatchard’s advised bet was “Back West Ham to win” at 2.08. With the information that he gave alone a more sensible bet of over 2.5 goals might have been more prudent. Final score 2-2
Next tipster given lip service by Betfair was Frank Monkhouse who in my opinion was actually trying to talk himself out of his advised bet of “Back Rangers at 1.95” when they travelled to Brondby. I quote “Rangers look shaky in defence and conceded the first goal at the weekend again” also “At Ibrox, Rangers struggled to beat the 10 men of Hibs, managed only a draw against Hearts after passing up several goalscoring opertunities, then battled back from two goals down to rescue a point against the Dons.” Does this really sound like a man who has confidence in a Rangers team? Perhaps not!! Final Score 1-1 with Brondby being on the score sheet first (Albeit from an own goal from Rangers ) From his write up Brondby scoring first might have been better advice!! Dan Finch was tasked with the Tottenham v Vitesse game in the UEFA Europa Conferance League that same evening and proceded to ramble on about the abilities of the new Spurs manager, Conte. An assumption that Conte would “likely switch to playing with 3 central defenders to help shore up a backline that has conceded in 11 of their last 12 games” was his total assertion that his advised bet of Tottenham to Win to Nil would come to fruition. He failed to mention one vital fact that Vitesse have scored in every single UEC game. Final score was 3-2 and a brief mention that over 2.5 goals was priced at 1.71 and a home win and over 2.5 goals increased this price to 1.95. Having spent just 3 minutes looking up Vitesse’s scoring ability I would never have backed a win to nil result at odds of 2.1
Kevin Hatchard was back in the limelight for the Leicester City game against Spartak Moscow and wile I agree with him that there was little value at backing Leicester to win at match odds of 1.33 he went on to say “we can boost that price to a much healthier 2.64if we back Leicester to win and both teams to score. Four of Leicester’s last 5 victories in ALL competitions have seen both teams find the net” What he failed to mention is that in the Europa League Leicester have achieved this just Twice. Having said this however this bet out of all the ones advised so far is the one with most credibility as one of these occasions was in fact the previous meeting of these two teams where Leicester won 3-2 in Moscow. Final score 1-1 In the final advised bet on the “cheat sheet” Dan Finch yet again rambled on about managers and not the teams ability to score or not as his advised bet of both teams to score in the Roma v Bodo/Glimt game should perhaps have included the fact that the Norwegian side are actually league leaders at home in the Eliteserien to give more weight to the advise given. This bet however was the only one to win at odds of 1.83 as the final score was 2-2
To summarise only 1 out of these 5 advised bets came in I feel that if more information had been forthcoming as to the actual relevancy of the individual advice three of these bets would have been discounted out of hand